Blogs & web sites

  • Evolving thoughts
    John Wilkins in Australia, on evolution, philosophy of biology, and other things.
  • HPB etc.
    Rob Skipper's blog on the history and philosophy of population genetics.
  • ISHPSSB
    International Society for the History, Philosophy, and Social Studies of Biology.
  • James Griesemer
    Jim Griesemer & lab UC Davis; philosophy of biology and related topics.
  • Philosophy of Biology Cafe
    Matt Haber at Utah, and several others, run a discussion forum on philosophy of biology
  • Schneier on security
    Bruce Schneier, expert on security
  • Three-Toed Sloth
    Cosma Shalizi is in the statistics department at Carnegie Mellon.
Blog powered by TypePad

  • Creative Commons License

« July 2003 | Main | September 2003 »

Patronage and technical work

Patronage plays an important part in the stratification of social worlds organized around technical work. It is the patronage in technical worlds that gives them much of their peculiar flavor, a vigorous compost produced by something that isn't really a social movement, and isn't really an ethnic group, but seems to act sometimes like either or both.

Continue reading "Patronage and technical work" »

Obligations among specialties (cont.)

I said in my post about burden of proof (last post, 3 August), that many of the relations among specialties can be seen as a network of settled obligations. At the same, unsettled relations among lines of research can often be seen as disputes about what obligations one specialty has toward the concepts, theories, and methods of another.

Many of the obligations among specialties are quite clear and solid. For example, research in many areas presupposes much of modern physics conceptually, theoretically, and procedurally, via embedding in instruments. It's easy to think up a chain of these dependencies: chemistry is obligated to physics, molecular biology is obligated to chemistry, cell biology is obligated to molecular biology, development is obligated to cell biology, and so on, so that we eventually wind up noticing, e.g., that Da Vinci's Last Supper (1498) is obligated to the physics of sub-atomic particles.

Continue reading "Obligations among specialties (cont.)" »

Burden of proof in scientific work

Lawrence Solum's recent elegant posting on burden of proof helps to clarify a related problem in understanding the relationships among scientific disciplines. Our model for thinking about burden of proof is, of course, the criminal trial and the rules of procedure which have grown up around it. But scientific research also involves extensive burden-of-proof considerations, for claims to discovery are subject to a similar kind of public scrutiny, complete with versions of cross-examination and rebuttal. Indeed, the historian Barbara Shapiro argues that scientific notions of fact-establishment are modeled on the legal procedures of the early modern period.

Here, I want to look at the way that distributing the burden of proof in scientific research acts to organize the relationship among specialties.

Continue reading "Burden of proof in scientific work" »