Blogs & web sites

  • Evolving thoughts
    John Wilkins in Australia, on evolution, philosophy of biology, and other things.
  • HPB etc.
    Rob Skipper's blog on the history and philosophy of population genetics.
  • ISHPSSB
    International Society for the History, Philosophy, and Social Studies of Biology.
  • James Griesemer
    Jim Griesemer & lab UC Davis; philosophy of biology and related topics.
  • Philosophy of Biology Cafe
    Matt Haber at Utah, and several others, run a discussion forum on philosophy of biology
  • Schneier on security
    Bruce Schneier, expert on security
  • Three-Toed Sloth
    Cosma Shalizi is in the statistics department at Carnegie Mellon.
Blog powered by TypePad

  • Creative Commons License

« September 2003 | Main | November 2003 »

Laws of cat

Posting pictures of cats has become a popular thing to do among bloggers (just enter "cat blog" in Google's image search and see, or try this). Rather than join that parade, I thought I'd post some generalizations about cats.

Continue reading "Laws of cat" »

Is the truth a popularity contest?

I said I was going to discuss some common errors in the science (or culture) wars. Here, I want to deal with one of the claims most irritating to sociologists-- the accusation that sociologists think that "truth is a popularity context" or that "anyone's opinion is just as good as anyone else's". This view is irritating just because it gets things so completely backwards.

Continue reading "Is the truth a popularity contest?" »

Does "socially constructed" mean "not real"?

When I started this blog, I thought that I'd avoid the running debates which make up the "science wars" front in the "culture wars". Bruno Latour's book and Michael Lynch's book are two very reasonable (and arguable) approaches by social scientists who often agree; here is a rich lode of materials on the other side.

I'm reluctant to get into these debates because I think that most of the points brought up the opposition are irrelevant to the problems of understanding how and why institutions (scientific or otherwise) work the way they do. I also think that many of the arguments in the science wars are of very poor quality. But avoiding the debates is an idle fantasy, and low quality is not a strong barrier to broad acceptance of an argument. So I find myself driven to deal with some of the more common mistakes which appear discussions of science studies. I'm going to try doing this in series of relatively short posts, dealing with one problem at a time.

Continue reading "Does "socially constructed" mean "not real"?" »