When I started this blog, I thought that I'd avoid the running debates which make up the "science wars" front in the "culture wars". Bruno Latour's book and Michael Lynch's book are two very reasonable (and arguable) approaches by social scientists who often agree; here is a rich lode of materials on the other side.
I'm reluctant to get into these debates because I think that most of the points brought up the opposition are irrelevant to the problems of understanding how and why institutions (scientific or otherwise) work the way they do. I also think that many of the arguments in the science wars are of very poor quality. But avoiding the debates is an idle fantasy, and low quality is not a strong barrier to broad acceptance of an argument. So I find myself driven to deal with some of the more common mistakes which appear discussions of science studies. I'm going to try doing this in series of relatively short posts, dealing with one problem at a time.